Common Artist Statement Phrases That Hurt More Than Help
Many artist statements fail not because the work is weak, but because the language is vague.
Certain phrases appear repeatedly across submissions. Over time, they lose clarity and impact.
Below are common patterns that reduce precision.
1. “Exploring the Human Condition”
This phrase appears frequently and says very little.
Ask instead:
Which aspect of the human condition?
Through what lens?
Under what circumstances?
Specificity communicates seriousness.
2. “Investigating Time and Space”
Time and space are universal concerns. Without context, this becomes empty language.
Replace abstraction with clarity.
For example:
This series examines the way abandoned industrial spaces retain traces of labor history.
Concrete language strengthens credibility.
3. “My Work Speaks for Itself”
Jurors do not need interpretation imposed on them. However, they do need context.
An artist statement is not explanation. It is framing.
Provide the conceptual orientation that supports the work.
4. Overloaded Theoretical References
Listing philosophers or movements without integration weakens authority.
If referencing theory, explain its direct relationship to the work.
Avoid name dropping.
5. Excessive Biography
Statements are not resumes.
Avoid opening with:
I have been creating art since childhood.
Instead begin with the current body of work.
Final Insight
A strong artist statement:
Is clear and specific
Grounds the work conceptually
Avoids abstraction for its own sake
Respects the reader’s time
Precision builds trust.
